Wagging the Moondoggie, Part VI
October 13, 2009
by David McGowan
“It took pilots
50 years to
progress from scarf-and-goggles barnstorming to setting down footprints
on the
David Nolan writing
in Popular
Mechanics, March 2007 (according to
the latest from NASA, we won’t be returning even after another
half-century has passed)
According to a media
advisory, “NASA’s Lunar CRater
Observation and Sensing Satellite (LCROSS) mission will come to a
dramatic conclusion at approximately 4:30 a.m. PDT (7:30 a.m. EDT) on
Friday, October 9, 2009, with the impact of the LCROSS Centaur upper
stage rocket and four minutes later, the impact of the LCROSS
Shepherding Spacecraft into Cabeus crater
near the moon’s south pole. To mark the event,
The news media, the scientific community and
amateur astronomers were all suitably excited. Clear back in June, when
the mission was launched, Scientific
American explained to readers how “Scientists expect the blast
to be so powerful that a huge plume of debris will be ejected.” The
second impact, the magazine further explained, would produce “a
spectacular explosion that should be visible in amateur astronomer’s
telescopes.”
The plan was that the first impact would send
up a huge cloud of lunar dust and debris, and the larger spacecraft
would then follow the same course, directly through the cloud, before
necessarily crashing into the surface of the Moon. It would only have
four minutes to gather data and transmit it back to Earth. As the LA
Times explained the day before the big event, “if all goes
according to plan, the spacecraft will fly through the cloud of debris
that will rise above the lunar surface and linger there briefly. As it
passes through the cloud, the satellite’s nine instruments will analyze
the dust and debris for evidence of water, before crashing itself.”
So in addition to providing a spectacular
show, the mission was also going to feed the American public’s need for
instant gratification by providing relatively quick results. In that
short four-minute span of time, we would gather all the data needed to
determine within days if there is water frozen in deep craters on the
Moon. The Times noted that, “Scientists preparing for the
collision could hardly contain their excitement over what might turn up
in that short time.” The crowd at
I would have guessed that very few, if any, amateur astronomers have telescopes 10 inches or longer, but I could be wrong. Or maybe I’m thinking of something else.
In addition to the gathering at the
I would hope not. How hard, after all, could
it possibly be? A full forty years ago we were able to set a manned
spacecraft gently down on the Moon – and then fire the engine back up
and fly home! Now, with four decades of additional experience and
vastly improved technology, all we had to do was send an unmanned
spacecraft on a one-way mission to crash into the Moon. How could NASA
possibly screw that up?
The media kept referring to the LCROSS mission
as the “bombing” of the Moon. Given that NASA is essentially an arm of
the US Department of Defense, this should have been a cakewalk. The
last time I checked, no one knew more about dropping bombs and firing
missiles than the
With the
As it turned out, the front-page space that all the major media outlets had undoubtedly set aside for the dazzling images wasn’t needed after all. With all eyes on the Moon, what all those viewing parties and all those amateur astronomers and all those giant telescopes saw was … absolutely nothing. The first impact, which was supposed to be captured on live video beamed back from the second spacecraft, never materialized. As the LA Times politely put it, “the plume failed to show on screen.” There is an explanation, of course: “Some scientists suspect the camera settings on the second spacecraft were incorrect, preventing it from spotting the plume.”
Yes, that must be it. You would think though that, what with the importance of the second craft being able to see the plume so that it could then fly through it, they would have gotten that detail right. But apparently they just don’t have the quality control over at NASA that they had back in 1969. As for why none of the amateur or professional telescopes aimed at the Moon captured the first plume, or the allegedly even larger second plume, NASA is going to have to get back to you on that. But probably not right away.
The Times was quick to reassure readers that “scientists might still pluck success from the mission’s anticlimactic ending … At a news conference more than two hours after the crash, mission scientists confirmed that the Centaur rocket made a crater when it hit, and that crater was about the expected size of more than 60 feet across.” There is no way to confirm that claim, of course, since the ship allegedly impacted inside a two-mile deep, pitch-black crater that hasn’t seen daylight for millions of years – which is exactly why it was targeted.
And how pointless, by the way, was this mission? The goal was supposedly to discover if there are large deposits of frozen water on the Moon that could be mined to provide water, breathable oxygen and rocket fuel for future lunar exploration and colonization. The water, if it exists, is at the bottom of deep, permanently dark craters where the temperature is said to hover at around -400° F. At those temperatures, the scientific community tells us, the water would be frozen as hard as rock.
Even if we assume that NASA could overcome all the problems with getting astronauts to the Moon and guaranteeing their survival while there, how exactly would they recover that water? Toss bombs in the craters and then try to run around and gather all the chunks of ice before they melt in the +280° F heat of the sun? Drive down into the craters in one of those folding dune buggies with floodlights, a couple of battery-powered jackhammers, some warm clothes and a shitload of batteries? Or are we going to build a giant, mechanized water-extraction facility of some kind with parts brought up one-at-a-time from Earth? How long do you suppose that will take?
It’s anyone’s guess what the real purpose of this mission was, but whatever goals were being pursued, it doesn’t seem to have gone so well. All that can be said for sure is that NASA appears to be but a shadow of its former self. Once upon a time, we were able to blast men off into space and then turn on our televisions and watch them, just four days later, stroll around on the Moon! Nowadays we send off an empty spaceship, wait patiently for nearly four months, and then watch as NASA fails to successfully crash that empty ship into the Moon.
Since the news media fell asleep at the wheel and failed to bring you the spectacular images that had been promised, I dropped by NASA’s website to pick up a few and bring them to you. The following three photos were labeled as “LCROSS Impact Images.” Following that is a link to NASA’s thrilling live video footage. Enjoy the show. It’s quite dazzling.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ndZ483ztduE
Did anyone notice, by the way, all the other ‘lunar modules’ that are recognizable in the larger image captured by NASA's LRO? As will be recalled, they are recognizable by the long shadows they cast. There are, most notably, probably nearly a dozen of them clustered around the crater to the right of the image. I wonder how the boys at NASA figured out which one was the ‘real’ lunar module?
